This article does not reflect the views of the FoPA, which has taken a strong position against the project in many other articles on this website and in “Green Paros’ Airport“, which we support.
Recently, after the decision to expand the airport, there has been a debate and some concern was expressed about the possible impact of this project. Let’s see what is really happening with this project.
The project.
The project is funded after the inclusion of the Act “Development and improvement of infrastructure of the new airport of Paros” in the Operational Program “Y.ME.PER.A.A 2014 – 2020”. The cost of the project amounts to 46.2 million euros incl VAT.
If the construction starts in the first half of 2022, then it can be completed before the summer of 2025.
What will be built.
A new terminal with a surface of about 13,000 sq. meters (the current airport has 745 sq. meters.), including parking spaces, the internal road network, a sewage treatment plant, security outpost, configuration of the space between the airport and the aircraft parking area. The equipment of the terminal is to include: Baggage management system, flight notice system, CUTE system (Common User Terminal Equipment), which significantly reduces queues and overcrowding during check-in, (this system has been installed in other airports in the country). With the new extension, the landing strip will reach a length of 1,799 meters compared to the existing 1,400 meters.
Finally, the construction of a new control tower of 159 sq. meters, and construction of a fire station of 563 sq. meters.
In addition, a study has been prepared for the hydraulic protection of the slopes of the new airport, for the implementation of hydraulic projects and asphalt paving, a project considered by the CAA, necessary for technical and environmental reasons. With the wastewater treatment plant, the treatment capacity will be increased and the subsoil disposal of the treated wastewater.
The purpose of the project is to offer better passenger facilities, to offer opportunities for attracting new investments in the context of sustainable development and the protection of the particular local environment. Significantly, it will also upgrade the services for the residents of Paros, facilitating their travel to the mainland, for health services and other “central” services.
They will also have direct access to European or neighboring destinations. The benefits of the new airport include an increase in employment with new jobs being created both during the construction phase of the project and during the operation of the airport. Also, the upgraded airport will increase of the value of the real estate and the production of local products.
The Objections: The main controversy is based on the fear of over-tourism that will put a strain on existing infrastructure. The roads will not withstand additional traffic, there will not be enough water and electricity, the volume of garbage will become unmanageable, and the sewer system will not withstand so much volume of sewage. The lack of a General Hospital will become even more pronounced.
The island will be fatally transformed into another “Mykonos” and the life of the inhabitants will be degraded. From the moment the charter flights ” Will come down”, large tourist resorts will be built to accommodate the incoming tourism. With the ease of air transportation, there will be more interest in buying or building new homes resulting in the island being built from end to end.
The project is a decision of the “state” and will serve interests that do not correspond to the local ones. Residents of the surrounding areas of the airport are concerned about the increase of noise pollution.
Let’s look at these objections more closely. As the beds on the island are a given number, the number of visitors will not increase. On the contrary, there is a high probability that they will decrease and in fact, without external intervention, the market will regulate this on its own. According to SETE data, out of the total number of visitors in Greece, 10% leave 30% of the turnover, they are the so-called “high end”. In a way, the higher the services provided, the lower the number of visitors.
Paros is the ideal place for “high end” visitors. Apart from the high end with luxury features, there are also the tourists with alternative features and the island can satisfy both types of visitors. The new airport will induce high level investments in accommodation, services, catering, and there will be a demand for “high level” local products.
The building is a reality, but it also happens currently without the new airport. If we look at the General Urban Planning that is valid for the island from May 2012, we will that allows the construction of 4- or 5-star hotels up to 80 beds in a field of 15 acres and above. Here the myth that huge tourist resorts will be built is refuted. As for the building of houses outside the plan, the prerequisite is to possess an terrain set at 8 acres (by way of derogation 4 acres in the old cut). There are two types of “zones”, the one that builds 100 sq. m. plus 20 sq. m. semi-outdoor with stone load-bearing masonry and the one that builds 280 sq. m .. In both “zones”, are not allowed any basement, floor other than the ground floor and swimming pool.
In addition, by “limiting partitions”, things become more difficult, e.g. one can own 50 acres of land and be allowed to build 100 sq. m. plus 20 sq. m. semi-outdoor without basement, first floor and pool. (And the owner is not free to divide his land say to parcels of 8 acres) There are also land use zones which protect the agricultural production.
We can see that now on the island, very few new hotels are being built, on the contrary many hotels are being renovated. There are very few beds that will be added and many that will be upgraded. And, if say, 100 new hotels could be built tomorrow, we would have 8,000 new beds. More than those created in the last 40 years. According to ELSTAT, in 2018 there were in Paros 4 hotels with 5 stars, with 211 rooms and 411 beds. Here we see the poverty of accommodation services.
The water is sufficient and comes from approximately 750 wells and 2 desalination plants that will be further strengthened with two new ones in Paroikia. Electricity is also enough since the island is already connected to the mainland. The road network is the best and most extensive in the Cyclades with the only problem being the ring road of Paroikia, which at some point will also find its solution.
There are three wastewater treatment plants, who are further enhanced, upgraded to tertiary treatment and the water that will be produced will be suitable for irrigation. Paros has a landfill and there is a study for a second cell that has been submitted for funding.
Regarding the solid waste management, the island does quite well. It will do even better with the two” Green Points” and a Biowaste Treatment Plant (BWW). The studies have been submitted for funding. Green Points (GPs) are demarcated and landscaped areas, with appropriate building infrastructure and equipment where deposited: recyclable materials, collected separately, such as paper, glass, metals, plastics, fabrics, edible oils or used items, equipment, furniture (equipment) electrical and electronic equipment) to be subsequently promoted for recycling or reuse. They also can collect green residues (branches, pruning, leaves, etc.). Regarding recycling, there is a Recyclable Materials Sorting Center (KDAW).
In terms of visitor’s numbers, at the peak period of the year, the boats bring about 23 thousand visitors a day and air travel about 1.500. Therefore, we have a total of 25 thousand visitors. With the upgrade of the airport, the air passengers will make a difference at best of 5 thousand passengers.
Let us note that the island is not an independent state and belongs to a whole, the Greek territory. It has rights and obligations and is part of the national planning and the laws. Let us imagine what the country would be like if the civil societies decided for the airport of Athens or the port of Piraeus or the big hospitals of Athens or for the Egnatia Odos etc.
I left for the end the serious problem that will arise with the noise pollution and the problems that it will bring to the residents around the airport. It is certain that measures must be taken to alleviate the problem of this nuisance.
Epilogue: This important project can accelerate the realization of other necessary infrastructure projects and rearrange the tourist market of the island.
The new airport can reverse the path to catastrophic hypertourism and rectify the situation. It will prolong the tourist season and thus there will be a more rational distribution of visitors within it, with the result that the Municipal Authority could make better planning of its services.
The island will have another project that will become an advantage, so that it can go ahead and leave behind the outdated model it offers until today.
Paros has all the characteristics to take the path of the cosmopolitan “high end ” and of the “alternative tourism”. The island could be chosen as a permanent residence for those who own houses on the island, so as to increase the number of permanent residents, As well as attracting more “digital nomads”.
Then maybe we could talk about building a hospital. We must keep in mind that the island lives from tourism and for several days at the peak season, the place will be crowded. But let us have a little patience when it comes to the prosperity of the place.
What is certain is that the cultural and social characteristics of the island, help not to become another “Mykonos” nor “Amorgos” or “Kimolos”. Those who dream of such a thing will be disappointed.
Sources: ELSTAT, SETE, Service of Civil Aviation (YPA) , Ministry of Interior, “ANTONIS TRITSIS” Program, Municipality of Paros, DEYAP.
Beaucoup de remarques intéressantes dans le courrier qui ont pour point commun que Paros change de façon massive depuis la fin du COVID à une vitesse folle. Je connais bien l’île puisque j’y vis en partie depuis 20 ans et connais les îles depuis 50 ans. Paros perd sa nature cycladique chaque année un peu plus. Exemples : La paralia de Parikia est une horreur en été et le port de Naoussa une catastrophe. La côte entre Ambelas et Mikri Santa Maria entièrement bétonnée de maisons californiennes prétentieuses. Tsouklia une plage sauvage se couvre de constructions. Sur les routes c’est un camion de béton, un camion d’eau, un buldozer Les hélicoptaires se posent au bord des routes sans aucune réglementation… Les poubelles débordent partout. Les tavernes disparaissent partout. Voilà pour les exemples. Rien ne peut à l’heure actuelle arrêter le phénomène. Pourquoi? Le système grec est basé sur le clientélisme, les combines, les hypocrisies. Les lois sont detournées. Toutes les nouvelles constructions au permis de construire douteux sont pourvues de piscines construites avec soit disant un permis ce qui globalement faux. A quand les pénuries d’eau sur l’île? Et beaucoup de grecs sont prêts à vendre la niche de leur chien. Voilà la réalité de notre île en été. Mais plus grave elle est défigurée pour l’avenir et la vie insulaire s’en trouve altérée. Exemple: plus de tavernes ouvertes ou très peu à partir le fin octobre. Enfin l’agrandissement de l’aéroport va faire de Paros la nouvelle plaque tournante de.s Cyclades sans aucun intérêt pour la population. Un blogueur l’a très bien dit: Pour venir on prend l’avion quand on peut et sinon le Blue Star est là. Paros va devenir un Disney Land ouvert 3 mois par ans. Hélas. Pourtant je l’aime bien notre île avec ses criques sauvages, la taverne de Julia ou d’Apostolis, ses campagnes vertes et fleuries en avril, ses landes brûlées de soleil en septembre. Et Yamas!
This article was written by someone who does not know that there are 4 STREMMATA TO AN ACRE. The building permits outside the city limit is not one house on 8 ACRES. It is one house on 8 stemmata.
Absolutely agree, today it is very difficult to travel to Paros for a WE for example, this will develop the island and extend the touristic season , no doubt , nice article
We first came to Paros in 1992 and have been coming every year since, we have travelled the world extensively over the years and have encountered all the benefits and disadvantages of mass tourism.
Where Paros has the unique advantage is it’s charm and unspoilt beauty lovely people and total relaxation that certainly cannot be found in destinations that cater for mass tourism with direct flights from other destinations within Europe.
But most importantly it is the type of tourist that the mass market attracts,, if you travel to other parts of Europe then you would understand that the norm Is drunken louts and huge increases in crime which would be a shame to see happen in Paros.
Speaking personally we would sadly not return to Paros but seek out one of the other islands that cater for the market that does not have a direct european connection.
This article makes some sensible points. First of all that what really matters is the number of hotel beds and houses as people need to sleep somewhere. The concern here is that the airport is an excuse and the catalyst for more real estate speculation. The two things are separate though and the municipality needs to come clean. Be clear as to the maximum number of hotel beds that the municipality sees as ideal and the number of secondary homes. Only when people are comfortable that this what the municipality means, they will be more comfortable with the airport expansion not being a Trojan horse. The same is true for the numbers of cars that can circulate on the island. There needs to be a target for the maximum number of them. The rest will follow.
I absolutely do not agree with you. There is NO solution for the noise pollution. The island is not crowded for a few days during high season but for almost 3 months! Even now in late September the road betweeen Paroikia and Naoussa experiences high traffic all day. There is absolutely nothing positive for the island of Paros and its nature when it comes to the extension of the airport. Lets stop wanting more and reaching higher, start respecting nature and enjoy what we have – our planet will be grateful!
My whole family and I agree with Bettina‘s comment..
There is definitely no need for an extension.
All Paros lovers came every year using ferry boats or flights depending on availability.
The island is completely full for 3-4 month! So the focus and priorities must be set on the question what does qualitative tourism need and how can Paros extend tourism in autumn and spring. There is enough availability of flights from Athens or ferries from Mykonos so the answer is definitely not to enlarge the airport and install an international one.
I completely agree with you. Our beautiful island will take a lot of advantages with the new airport